User talk:Jameboy/Archive 13

Untitled

When creating a new article, e.g. 1971–72 Everton F.C. season, while it is perfectly acceptable to use another article as a template for layout, you shouldn't really copy and paste info across with the intention of overwriting with the new details later. If you can't fill in all the correct information in one edit, either do it in small stages or copy it elsewhere (e.g. your sandbox or a text file on your computer) and do the work there. It is misleading to have information for one season in a different article. I'm sure I've mentioned this to you before. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 23:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your creation of 1969–70 Everton F.C. season, it seems you continue to ignore my request. Do you even read your talk page? --Jameboy (talk) 16:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for the advice. I have now been using the sandbox for Everton articles for the last 2 weeks--Pete Davis (talk) 17:47, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re:List of Major League Baseball career batting average leaders

Thanks for your kind reminder, It’s my fault. I confused Baseball-Reference.com with MLB’s related site by mistake. I reverted my edit already.(Special:diff/855575641)--Ch.Andrew (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ch.Andrew: Hey, no worries. --Jameboy (talk) 15:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My edit summary on 2018 Tampa Bay Rays season

It definitely won't happen again for the rest of this baseball season. Tampabay721 (talk) 00:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Jameboy. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:45, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jameboy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 UEFA Europa League first qualifying round

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 UEFA Europa League first qualifying round. This discussion is focused on whether we should merge content or not. Hhkohh (talk) 14:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"7F15" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 7F15. Since you had some involvement with the 7F15 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Kleuske (talk) 13:46, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simpson’s Production codes

Production codes are stuff for the affikcionados, it took me a while to figure out what they were. I listed one of them at WP:RfD, to gage the opinion of other users, but I do not think these redirects are very helpful. Besides, the codes may be in use for other purposes, as they are hardly unique, which may result in a maze of dB-pages. Kleuske (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Football League Championship play-off Final

Hey Jameboy, hope you're well and keeping safe. I've been working through Championship play-off final articles back from 2019 (I started with 2000 in all honesty, ITFC's glory in the sun against Barnsley) and every article I've worked on has been duff, but I'm now at the 2007 article which I note into which you had serious input. I've got a decent "template" for these articles up and running (something like a dozen GAs now) but I didn't want to stomp all over this one without at least inviting you to help/object etc? Take a look at any of the Championship play-off final pages post-2007 and let me know what you think. What I'd really like is for help on getting up to GAN. Anyway, I hope all is well and that you won't mind if I make some adjustments with (preferably) or without you to build this article up to GA status. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 22:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Union Of Knives: New article

Hi there, I've just started a new article for Union of Knives. As you have helped contribute to the Baby Chaos article in the past, could I ask your thoughts on this please? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Union_Of_Knives Many thanks VPeck (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Wilson (footballer, born 1861)

The article Joe Wilson (footballer, born 1861) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY, no evidence of WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Pearson (footballer)

The article Tom Pearson (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY, no evidence of WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notices removed, both players obviously notable having played in a professional league. ---Jameboy (talk) 14:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English Football League as a 'fully professional league'

The English football league was far from 'fully professional' at that stage – see User:Bring back Daz Sampson/Professionalism in English football. There is a currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues to decide on a suitable cut-off date and at the moment consensus seems to be pointing to around 1958 (creation of Division Four) or 1961 (abolition of the maximum wage), although it's clear there were swathes of part-timer teams and players competing much more recently than this. If you have any fact-based contributions to the discussion we'd be pleased to consider them. Thanks, Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree something has gone massively wrong! That's why the more knowledgeable editors we can bring to the discussion, the better our chances of finding a workable solution. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Premier League aggregate score record

I know that, that's why I asked "so what?" Unfortunately, that user didn't seem to want to engage regarding the encyclopaedic merits of the content and ignored my question. If anyone could provide a reason to include it, I'd be open to it, but considering it's so hard to source, it's clearly not a stat that anyone particularly gives much of a damn about, and therefore doesn't have any place in that article. Cheers. – Pee Jay 16:29, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Base running, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philadelphia Quakers. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ELFC

The page ELFC has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Jameboy!

Happy New Year!

Jameboy,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UP#CMT

Hi Jameboy, please have a look at WP:UP#CMT. Thanks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: Noted, thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 20:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]